Tag Archive | "AGU News"

@StrongTea1776, @AGUgrizzlies Rally to defeat NYSAFE Act

 
 

Richmond County Tea Party Patriots and Gun Rights Across America yesterday held a rally in the rain to defeat Gov. Cuomo’s unconstitutional and ill-conceived NYSAFE Act. Tea Party Patriots member and American Grizzlies United / Organize4Palin NY State Coordinator, Ron Devito spoke at this rally, beginning at the 21:45 mark in the video. His remarks were covered by the Staten Island Advance.

The Richmond County Tea Party Patriots were initially denied the permit to hold the rally, but it was ultimately granted. The denial may or may not be part of a pattern of harassment and intimidation of Tea Party and conservative groups that has been ongoing with the IRS under the Obama administration and reflecting at the local level.

945493_10200188386294580_567295771_n

Photo by Virginia Ross. Rally signage….

981081_10200536597410495_165881115_o

Photo by Scott Fertitta. Members of the Richmond County Tea Party Patriots and the public gather in the rain to protest the NYSAFE Act.

943293_10200188386094575_1351250780_n

Photo by Virginia Ross. More rally signage…

DSC_0007

Bobby Zahn, President Richmond County Tea Party Patriots tells the assembled audience that we must defeat Andrew Cuomo to defeat the NYSAFE Act.

DSC_0028

Dino Longueira, Member, Richmond County Tea Party Patriots talks about what is wrong with the NYSAFE Act.

DSC_0034

Louis Adimando, Member, Richmond County Tea Party Patriots speaks about liberty versus tyranny.

936850_10200188384414533_889282685_n

Photo by Virginia Ross. Ron Devito, Member, Richmond County Tea Party Patriots, NY State Coordinator, AGU/O4P speaks about actions the grassroots can take to defeat the NYSAFE Act.

Transcript of “Molon Labe by Legal, Political Processes”

Fellow citizens and patriots: I would like to begin by asking those of you who served to please raise your hand. We salute you, we honor you, we thank you – without your sacrifice we would not be standing here today.

When we last gathered three months ago on a cold, rainy Saturday, I ended my speech with two Greek words: Molon Labe – Come and Take it. Those words conjure up images of jack-booted thugs kicking down doors to take our guns as we fight in a last stand for freedom.

Back then I discussed some proposed legislation that envisioned confiscation including language in an earlier version of the NYSAFE Act. None of us here ever want to see that day come, so I am here to talk about how we put Molon Labe into action via the legal and political process….

Read the full story

Posted in AGU News, Current News, PoliticsComments (0)

@DrGinaLoudon: @AGUGrizzlies PA Coord on Hughes’ Meltdown, Pop Culture

Kevin Scholla, Pennsylvania State Coordinator, American Grizzlies United / Organize4 Palin and host, SarahNET Radio yesterday defended former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin’s interactions with the grassroots and her involvement with pop culture on the Dr. Gina show in a 20-minute segment. The interview followed his written response to Scottie Hughes’ infamous meltdown over not getting an interview and / or meet and greet with Gov. Palin. Hughes was on the show the day before to discuss her position on the issue.

Whisper Campaign?

Dr. Gina spoke about a “whisper campaign behind the scenes at CPAC” amongst journalists in both mainstream and new media complaining about their lack of access to Gov. Palin.

“Like you, I know Scottie Hughes….I spoke with her at length yesterday after the piece came out. Scottie was a guest on my show in January, so just two short months before she wrote this article. Listen, everybody has their right to an opinion on how they feel they’re being treated or what they want to do with Sarah Palin as far as an interview,” Scholla said.

He continued, “Scottie Hughes has Sarah’s book autographed on her mantle. She has a trivet – or whatever you ladies call these things hanging in her house with Sarah’s quote on it. This isn’t someone who is not a supporter of Palin or was. That said, it’s the way it was done. OK, I think if you want to talk about, ‘hey I wish Sarah came out and did an interview,’ fine.

In concluding his answer, Scholla said, “but some of the parts of the article that were written, ‘you’re starting to worry me’ as the opening line; talking about the Chick-Fil-A shirt and the Phoenix Suns game, and the teleprompter. I think that rubbed a lot of people the wrong way and it’s really not helpful. We know the left is after Sarah, we know the moderates are threatened by her. The last thing we need is a narrative out there – false or not – of ‘oh look now the conservatives don’t even like her.’”

Could Blogosphere Rumblings over Access Harm Gov Palin More than Hughes?

Dr. Gina asked,

“What if there is such a rumbling in the blogosphere and the new media…that they would just stop talking favorably about Sarah Palin right in time for the 2014 elections, therefore, somewhat muzzling her message which has always been … such a clear voice for conservatives? If that were to be muffled, is the greater harm in that message being muffled or in Scottie saying some things – perhaps poorly chosen verbiage – but maybe a message that might penetrate now that it’s become such a story for Sarah Palin? What do you think about that?”

Scholla said Hughes’ article “came across as negative – the message – because things were said along the lines of ‘fame, Hollywood’. Sarah Palin is the furthest thing from that. This is a woman who spent her birthday this year at the funeral of Chris Kyle, the Navy Seal. This is someone who does things the right way pretty much all the time and loves this country, and so I guess the way it could have been presented – I wouldn’t have written the thing at all.”

He continued,

“But, if there was a disappointment about being not able to interview the Governor, I think the way it should have been presented is ‘hey it was a great speech Gov. Palin gave, that Big Gulp meant a whole lot more than soda pop. It stands for liberty. We need her voice out there. She could really speak to conservatives. I hope she does more of these and I hope we have her on more shows.’ That would have been a positive way to write it instead of bringing up questions of – why are we even talking about her at an NBA game or about Dancing with the Stars?”

Dr. Gina Playing Both Sides or Stopping Circular Fire?

A caller said Dr. Gina was playing “both sides of the street,” but Dr. Gina defended her lengthy record supporting Gov. Palin. She said “circular fire is the last thing conservatives need. What do you think, Kevin?”

Scholla answered,

“I think the reason we’re seeing such passionate responses here is because this shouldn’t have been done the way it was done. You know, I run a show exclusively based on Gov. Palin and her values, and I wasn’t upset. I knew ahead of time that she was not doing interviews. I mean, sure I’d like to interview her at CPAC and many other times. Heck, I’d like to have her come and watch the Bears with me every NFL Sunday night, but you know Sarah Palin is going to do what she wants to do. She can’t be drafted into running for President and she’s not going to be guilted or pushed into doing interviews or anything that she doesn’t feel she wants to do at that time.

The other thing I think we need to point out here, Dr. Gina is that Sarah Palin is unique – as we know – in so many ways, and her speeches do a lot as far as her message. You know a lot of other folks are reading the teleprompter; a lot of other folks are talking about talking points. She really does get it all out there a lot of the time, so people should be able to get the information they need for the time being until an interview does happen, and I think that’s another thing to take into consideration here.”

SarahNET Radio About Gov. Palin’s Message, Values

Dr. Gina asked Scholla if Gov. Palin has been on his show.

Scholla said,

“We have had her family on. We had a special show with Bristol during her latest adventure on Dancing With the Stars – Breaking it Down with Bristol, where Bristol was on every week. Todd has been on. We’ve had her dad and her brother on, but the thing about Sarah Palin – and people have asked us about this before – we don’t even ask Sarah Palin to come on. We wait for Sarah Palin to do what she needs to do….Sarah Palin is a wonderful person, but it goes beyond just her. It’s her message, it’s her values….the whole reason for the show in the first place was to give her fair coverage for her Presidential run in 2012. Well, when that never happened, we said ‘are we still going to do the show?’ and we said, ‘yeah, we are,’ because it’s not just about her. It’s what she represents – her values.

It’s about my daughter as well. It’s about having someone – especially a woman – like Sarah Palin who’s out there and doing everything the right way so you know with all the beatings she’s taken over the years from the media – I mean unbelievable – just mean-spirited attacks, you’ve got to realize when Scottie or anyone puts out an article like this, it hurts people. It hurts supporters. Palin, it probably hurts the least. She is so tough, but she is so human, but it hurts her kids, it hurts Todd, it hurts her family when [Scottie]‘s saying she doesn’t get out there, doesn’t shake hands; she needs a teleprompter. It’s just not true!

Dr. Gina on Celebrity Wife Swap

Dr. Gina shifted to how taking part in popular culture is condemned by so many facets of conservative media and mentioned her own appearance on Celebrity Wife Swap which airs March 28.

Scholla said, “Well, we wish you the best of luck with that tomorrow. We’ve been praying for you on that and rooting for you as well, but to answer your question we should absolutely be involved in everything.” He continued, “first of all, there’s this persona out there that the left likes to paint of conservatives – you know – the old country club conservative or the old Republican – the stuffy, old guard that is just out of touch with everything. We love sports, we love music, we certainly watch television and listen to the radio, and when we do hear people talk about “normal things” from our side, that’s very refreshing.”

Gov. Palin Reaches New Audiences via Pop Culture

Scholla harkened back to Gov. Palin donning the Chick-Fil-A tee shirt and attending the Suns game. He said, “I think she gets under the skin of the left so much, but another thing she does. When a picture is posted of her in a Chick-Fil-A shirt…it brings up the conversation of Sarah Palin, and it brings up the conversation of what she stands for and that’s about businesses being able to make their own choices and present things the way they wish to. I think getting involved in that is absolutely a top priority.”

Scholla continued, “you’ve seen the wonderful response when she’s gone on something – say Saturday Night Live. Why shy away? At worst, you walk out of there breaking even, at best you change a couple of people and they realize, hey wait a minute, the media is painting these conservatives to be something they’re not at all. So, when you see somebody like a Palin, a Bristol out there like that – I think you can reach another audience.”

Can’t Criticize Lack of Coverage if we Cower in Corner

Dr. Gina said conservatives can’t criticize the media for lack of coverage if they cower in a corner.

“And on the flip side, if you do those things, you can very well criticize, because you can say, ‘hey, we were right there with you, we did the same things, and now you’re making up these false narratives about us.’” Scholla referred to an interview with Ben Shapiro in which Shapiro said leftists should be called out when we go on their shows. Scholla said Gov. Palin does precisely that.

“When she calls Obama out, she calls him out. She says exactly what we’re saying at our kitchen tables and at work, not like McCain, not like Romney, where the message was, ‘I’m good, so is Obama, but vote for me please’ and then ‘he’s over his head.’ She talks about the fact that he knows exactly what he’s doing, and he wants to institute far left European policies in this country,” he said

Reality TV Perfect Medium to Showcase Conservatism

Dr. Gina said the left is going to bad-mouth us whether we engage the culture or not. The left also likes to portray us as deeming ourselves perfect, then exposing some imperfection. The antidote to that is to admit our imperfection, and reality TV is the perfect medium for that.

Scholla said, “you mentioned Sarah Palin’s Alaska. You saw the humanness of her family, the way they acted. She’s so ordinary, yet so extraordinary. You get that from the family. The way she deals with Piper or her other kids – not like some of these other politicians – and I hate to even use that word for Sarah Palin, because it’s become such a bad word – you look at the way they interact and you look at others – it’s all packaged.” On Sarah Palin’s Alaska, you see normal family interaction.

He continued, “we need to be out there, because we’re doing these things. We’re listening to music, we’re consumers too, and there are certainly a lot of athletes out there that are conservative in baseball, football, NASCAR drivers. I think country music, and I think a lot of metal music you have conservatives….but yes, Sarah Palin and all of us need to get out there, but at the same time, Sarah Palin is going to do what she thinks is best.”

“Another thing we need to realize for people who wanted to interview her but didn’t: she was on that Fox contract for quite a while, so some of these things that didn’t happen could have been related to that as well. I don’t know the verbiage of her contract obviously, but I do know for someone else at Fox – for them, not for Sarah Palin – that Fox frowned on them going on other shows – and that’s one thing that was not brought into this whole flap this week.”

Kevin Scholla’s segment with Dr. Gina begins at 01:16:20.

Listen anywhere, anytime. Save this audio to your device.

Posted in AGU News, Commentary/Editorial, Current News, Politics, Sarah PalinComments (0)

@DrGinaLoudon Show: @AGUGrizzlies TX Coord Defends Gov Palin’s Grassroots Interactions

Michelle McCormick, Texas State Coordinator, American Grizzlies United / Organize4 Palin yesterday defended former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin’s interactions with the grassroots on the Dr. Gina show in a 15-minute segment. The interview followed on the heels of McCormick’s written response to Scottie Hughes’ infamous meltdown over not getting an interview and / or meet and greet with Gov. Palin. Hughes was on the show prior to discuss her position on the issue.

Hughes – a CPAC Organizer – Should Have Known Better

In her response, McCormick said,

“Well, I thought it was a rude and incredibly immature thing to write. Everybody has to understand that Gov. Palin is an incredibly busy lady. I mean, you’re a mom, you can appreciate, she’s got kid’s schedules to worry about, and so just on that surface, she needs to understand that Gov. Palin can’t be everywhere and meet with everyone. I understand her being upset about that, maybe a little frustrated, but the way that she expressed those feelings I thought was incredibly immature, and flat-out rude and inaccurate and that’s basically what it all came down to. That’s just not how the whole CPAC stuff went down, and she should know better, because from what I can tell she was an organizer with CPAC, and so I’m not sure where this anger from her is coming from.”

Gov. Palin One of the Most Humble People in Politics….

Dr. Gina said she had met Gov. Palin many times, often backstage, but she never was able to get the elusive media interview with her, though she has chased after her and begged people with connections. Of course, access to political figures or lack thereof, has been a complaint among journalists since time immemorial.

“I certainly am not privy to Gov. Palin’s schedule, but from what I have experienced doing events with her teams and I know you’ve seen this too, her schedule is just so tight plus the fact that anytime she goes somewhere, she’s completely mobbed by people. I know, and you know this as well – she is one of the most humble people in politics, and she is such a team player that I would imagine that any disruption caused by her presence – I’m sure she would just want to avoid that, so it really is difficult it appears to me with her travel schedule to do things – I’m sure along the way she can fulfill media requests. Tony Lee pointed out in his Breitbart article – that one of the first interviews she gave after separating with Fox was with Breitbart News.”

Can’t Get Enough of Gov. Palin….

Dr. Gina asked, “we know Gov. Palin is super-accessible. Is it just that we want more of her?”

“Oh yeah, that’s what it comes down to,” McCormick replied. “You know…her staff are some of the most professional, kind people I’ve ever run across in my very brief time in doing this with politics. I know that in Iowa, there were staffers for other candidates who were not very friendly at all. With Gov. Palin’s team, they are incredibly polite, they are professional, and they do make time for Gov. Palin to go and meet with folks – and you saw from the various pictures that came out of CPAC. She was hugging people and taking pictures and I’ll speak for myself. I’m truly a nobody in all this and she had a few words with me and it’s great. She is so appreciative of everyone’s support and all the work that they do who are ultimately just out for the cause. She sees that and she is very supportive and appreciative of that.

Shedding Light on Experiences with Team Palin….

Dr. Gina said McCormick is not a “nobody,” adding that grassroots organizer are the most powerful people in politics, because they can effectuate change. She said McCormick is worth any political figure’s time. Dr. Gina said we should not have circular fire amongst ourselves and asked if “we could have a peace agreement” whereby Hughes likes Gov. Palin very much and just wanted an interview.

“Oh, sure. I didn’t want this to be a personal attack on Ms. Hughes. I think we tried to at least with Conservatives4Palin in our response. We just wanted to shed some light on on our experiences with Team Palin and they’ve been always wonderful and favorable and maybe a lot of it was disappointment that she chose to express herself in such a snarky manner. That’s unfortunate.”

It’s About the Movement, Principles, Not Gov. Palin

Dr. Gina asked, “Is there anything else you want to tell us, Michelle?”

“There are a lot of people who go unnamed – there are a lot of wonderful folks who go to Tea Party rallies, they block walk, they make phone calls, and they never ask for anything in return except for clean government and honest politicians and they see those qualities in Gov. Palin and they support her. That is why they do it. They don’t ask for any glory or any titles, so those are the people really we need to raise up and support and be thankful for, and the first person who definitely understands that and recognizes that is Gov. Palin, and that is why she has so much support behind her. It’s not about her. It’s about the movement and the principles and we definitely need to support people who think that way in politics.”

The segment featuring McCormick’s call-in begins 01:05:38 into the video. The segment with Hughes began at 00:16:31.

Posted in AGU News, Commentary/Editorial, Current News, Opinion, Politics, Sarah PalinComments (0)

New Video Explains Gov Palin’s Transformational, Servant Leadership

US for Palin and NY4Palin this afternoon released Sarah Palin’s Leadership Style, a PowerPoint presentation professionally narrated by Kevin Scholla, host of the Palin Update on SarahNET Radio. The presentation examines the two leadership styles that define former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin: Transformational Leadership and Servant Leadership. It examines the Charismatic style and why she is not a Charismatic Leader, her bases of power and contingencies to her power. The presentation concludes with Gov. Palin’s current vision, mission, and strategies.

Whether Gov. Palin pursues elective office in the coming years or chooses another path, Transformational and Servant Leadership defined her executive experience and will define her future.

Scholla and Devito are the Pennsylvania and New York (respectively) State Coordinators for American Grizzlies United / Organize for Palin.

Posted in AGU News, Current News, Sarah PalinComments (0)

Non-Romney Voter Survey Says: “History Has Repeated. Bold Colors, no Pale Pastels.”

Almost immediately after Obama was reelected, a statistic was released to the effect that Romney got 2.3 million less votes than McCain got in 2008. That number has since been called into question and ultimately discredited.

Cacophony of Opinions

Why did Romney lose? It depends on who you listen to among the cacophony of pundits expressing a confusing array of opinions – all in conformance with the opinion-holder’s world view of course. Some, such as Wall Street Journal columnist Kimberly Strassel and Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank blame it on the GOP not having any ground game for the Hispanic vote. Others such as Michael Medved of the Daily Beast blame it on a highly effective negative ad campaign Obama ran against Romney. Medved disputes the notion that the GOP has a demographics problem. Obama got fewer votes in 2012 than he did in 2008, according to Medved who also said that Obama’s gains among Hispanics were minimized by the decline in the number of blacks who voted for him.

Battleground Watch says Romney relied on flawed internal polling. Others cite massive voter fraud – especially with touchscreen machines sans a paper ballot backup and still others cite anti-Mormon sentiment.

The Republican Party is “too socially conservative” says Republican Alien Professor, citing “changing social mores.” Speaking of “social mores,” some have alleged that Evangelicals simply would not vote for a Mormon, but data does not support this assertion at all. According to Eric Gorski of the Denver Post, 80% of Evangelicals voted for Romney. Nancy French, who spent a month in the Palin home to help Bristol Palin write Not Afraid of Life, was the founder and publisher of Evangelicals for Mitt. French hosts Bristol’s Blog on Patheos. As we’ll see later, the number of people who cited Romney’s faith as their reason to not give him a vote appears to be miniscule.

Professor John Switzer, who posts as “The Liberty Professor” suggests that Romney failed because he made his economic message “us versus them” and also because the Republican Party is trying too hard to be like the Democratic Party.

But Some Number of Conservatives Did Not Want Romney…

However many votes Romney got in 2012 versus McCain in 2008, some number of voters either did not vote at all or did vote, but abstained, voted for existing third party candidates or used the write-in. Did these voters hand victory to Obama on a silver platter? It’s debatable. But, their discontent with the Republican Party and its offerings is not debatable.

Over 37 years have passed since Ronald Reagan gave his famous “Bold Colors” speech. This speech was born out of his polling voters who stayed home, yielding a disastrous election result for the GOP. The voters Reagan polled said they saw no difference between the two parties. There was much talk back in 1975 about forming a third party. Sound familiar? Reagan, who had been a Democrat said he became a Republican because the party was different – not because it was the same. His words grace the US for Palin site in reference to former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin’s endorsed candidates.

AGU Survey Launched

While there has been no shortage of speculative opinions and blame assignment on this disastrous outcome, no one has polled the non-voters to see what motivated their behavior, and to get some sense of where this Republican Party should go. On November 19, in my capacity as New York State Coordinator for American Grizzlies United/Organize4Palin, I launched a survey to begin answering these questions.

Polls Versus Surveys

A poll consists of only one question. Online Polls are routinely and very easily astroturfed by all parties concerned who want to show their candidate or opinion as being in the lead. Professional pollsters often purposely bias the single question to gin up the desired response. When Gov. Palin said, “polls are for strippers and cross-country skiers,” she was on target. Polls are not reliable indicators of anything.

A survey consists of several questions, follows a much more scientific process, and is far more difficult to astroturf. The magic number for a survey sample size is 400 because it yields a +/- 5% margin of error and a confidence level of 95%. Reaching this number usually requires paid panels through a market research firm or surveying multiple specific constituencies. Surveys require considerable thought as to question composition and a lengthy, often costly implementation process. A properly executed targeted survey of the general public with a sample of 400 can cost $750 to $1,500 or even more, with the higher costs being either for pre-qualified responses or surveying large panels and weeding out disqualified responses.

AGU Survey Methodology

The AGU survey is preliminary and it closed with 149 respondents. The margin of error on this survey is, therefore, 8.03%. The survey had a 100% incidence rate, meaning there were no disqualified respondents and no mid-survey terminates. No quota was set. The Republican Party has a clear and present interest in determining its political direction, thus the onus is on the GOP to survey a representative sample of its membership. The AGU survey was posted on key Palin sites, Free Republic, some generic conservative sites, and Ron Paul sites to get as representative a sample as possible of non-Romney voters. Special thanks to Josh Painter, US for Palin Editor and the Publisher of Sarah Palin Journal; Elizabeth Hawkes, Youth for Palin; and Isabel Matos, GOP Are You Listening for promoting this survey to the various non-Palinista constituencies. No paid panels were used, because this preliminary survey was conducted without a budget. I purposely did not mention any candidate’s names except for Romney or Obama in question lists, since candidates’ names are loaded words that connote different things to different readers. I instead had respondents fill in their choices tabula rasa.

AGU Survey Results

As we see from the first chart, of the 149 people surveyed, 116 voted in the 2012 general election, 31 did not vote at all citing disgust with both parties, and two did not vote at all due to sickness, accident, or other emergency.

The second chart reveals that the largest bloc of those who did vote – 61 – picked an existing third party candidate on the ballot. The second largest bloc – 51 – used the write-in. The remaining voters voted down-ticket only and abstained from the Presidential contest. There is an apparent discrepancy between the number of non-votes and those who voted in the 2012 general election. This is because some respondents abstained in the Presidential contest, yet voted down-ticket.

Gov. Palin got the lion’s share of the write-in choices with 38 votes. Libertarians Ron Paul and Gary Johnson were second and third in trail with 13 and 10 votes respectively. The remaining three votes went to fringe candidates.

“No difference between the two candidates” represented the largest sub-group in the sample with 54 responses. “Not a true conservative” took the second largest sub-group with 25 responses.

Flashback 37 years: “More than half of those who didn’t vote have been polled and say, ‘it no longer makes any difference which party wins….’”

Excessive change in positions on issues – “flip flopping” – took the third largest sub-group with 21 responses.

Only five people cited Romney’s Mormonism as their reason for not voting for him. Three were of the “Mormons aren’t real Christians” mindset. The other two were against all religion and cited Romney and/or the GOP being “too religious” as their reasons. Both sides only add up to 2.68% between them.

All 149 respondents expressed who they wanted to see run in 2012. Gov. Palin got 82 responses – 55%, followed by the Pauls, Johnson, Judge Napolitano, and Jesse Ventura – the Libertarians at 44 votes or 30%. Fringe candidates took 13 responses, and 10 people didn’t have a candidate in mind for 2012.

The vast majority of respondents 116 or 79% said the GOP should return to the principles of Reagan conservatism. Only 32 respondents or 21% said the Republican Party should “broaden the base” by becoming more moderate on social issues.

The 82 people who wanted Gov. Palin to run in 2012 are obviously Palinistas. Among them only two people chose “broaden the base,” and that choice may have been an unintended selection error. One did not vote at all due to disgust with both parties. The other Palinista voted for Gov. Palin using the write-in and picked Romney’s excessive changes in positions as the reason for discomfort with Romney. A strong argument could be made to infer that these two Palinistas intended to choose Reagan conservatism, but an equally strong argument could be made against that decision, for the respondents may in fact have intended their answers. A surveyor may use inference to correct obvious errors. To use inference in this instance is incorrect, because doing so interjects surveyor’s bias. The two Palinistas’ choices stand as entered.

Our community has always seen Gov. Palin as “Reagan in a woman’s body,” and this is often depicted by images of Reagan’s spirit toasting, saluting, passing a torch or otherwise transitioning his legacy to Gov. Palin. I should know, since I am the creator of the saluting montage. That 98% of our community would respond with a return to Reagan conservatism is not a surprise….

What is surprising is that 44 respondents identified as Libertarians via their desired 2012 candidate choices, yet 24 out of the 44 or 55% joined ranks with our Palinista community in saying that the GOP should return to Reagan conservatism. Libertarians are fiscal conservatives, foreign policy isolationists, and tack far toward the left on social issues. The majority support abortion-on-demand as well as legalization of drugs and prostitution as core components of their platform. Libertarians tend to be non-religious if not outright anti-religious. Libertarians are RINOs, because many of their positions contradict the Republican Party platform. So, 55% of this sub-sample within this constituency supporting a return to Reagan conservatism is a surprise. I can only conclude that fiscal conservatism took priority over social liberalism for this group. The remaining 45% not surprisingly chose “broaden the base.”

This preliminary survey with its 8.03% margin of error is not the end-all or be-all. The results will be forwarded to Reince Priebus, the GOP party chair with the suggestion that he either continue the study until the sample size reaches 400 or conduct one of his own. Will he do either? I won’t know until he is asked. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. Irrespective of Mr. Priebus’ decision, 79% of the entire sample – supporters of multiple political figures – said they wanted a return to Reagan conservatism. Even 55% of a group we would consider RINOs also desire this return to basics.

This survey suggests that history has repeated itself:

“Let’s have a new first party – a Republican Party – raising a banner of bold colors – no pale pastels – a banner instantly recognizable as standing for certain values which will not be compromised.”

Posted in AGU News, Current News, Politics, Sarah PalinComments (0)

American Grizzlies Launches Survey of Non-Romney Voters

When addressing Young Americans for Freedom in 1975, former President Ronald Wilson Reagan said,

“Some have suggested that the 1974 election – the disastrous results – were an indictment of what we stand for. Well, may I suggest that the meaning of the last election will not be found among those who voted. It will be found in my polling those who stayed home – the biggest non-voter bloc in our nation’s history. And why did they stay home?”

It is well-known that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan got 2.3 million less votes than John McCain and Sarah Palin did in 2008. Pundits have speculated about the reasons why, but there is no hard data to support their assertions.

This survey is an attempt to arrive at the truth of why these 2.3 million people either stayed home or abstained, chose existing third party candidates, or wrote in candidates. If you are among these voters, please take a few minutes to respond. You will not be asked to divulge any personal or contact information.

Our work continues…

Posted in AGU News, Current News, Politics, Sarah PalinComments (0)

 

Sarah Palin's Tweets

Paid for by PalinPromotions.com